As water is likely to do mischief if it escapes - and this water did escape out of the reservoir and down the mineshafts - the defendant was liable for all the damages that were a natural consequence of that mistake. In Read v. Lyons, Lord Macmillan stated that "the doctrine of Rylands v. Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130 R v Clarke (1927) 40 CLR 227 Gough v Thorne [1966] 1 WLR 1387 ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Defences Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207 Farrer v Nelson (1885) 15 QB 258 Research 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We're 100% Free! Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953) Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187 Hale v Jennings Bros. The contractors negligently failed to block up the claimant's mine which was situated below the land. Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions) Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27 Wennhak v Morgan [1888] 20 QBD 635 The first volume in a brand-new middle-grade anthology series with Marvel Comics, edited by John Jennings. 666, Bunn & Bunn v Rees & Parker [2002]All ER (D) 81, Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401, Canada Steamship Lines v The King [1952] AC 192, Car & Universal Credit v Caldwell [1964] 2 WLR 600, Carillion Construction v Felix [2001] BLR 1, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention, Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi, The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm), Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130, Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37, City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129, Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898, Countess of Dunmore v Alexander (1830) 9 S. 190, CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher[1994] 4 All ER 714, Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing[1951] 1 KB 805, Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, (1876) 1 App Cas 554, Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees[1978] Ch 231, Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696, Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265, Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors[1965] 1 WLR 623, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by offeror, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by third party, Dimmock v Hallett (186667) LR 2 Ch App 21, Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) [2009] EWHC 716, DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 Ch D 459, Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp[1955] 2 QB 327, Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218, Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers), Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation), Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs & Excise[1976] 1 WLR 1, The Eurymedon, New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v A M Sattherthwaite & Co [1975] AC 154, George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803, Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294, Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270, Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha [2007] UKHL 12, Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570, Great Northern Railway Company v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16, Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407, Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996] CLC 1127, Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564, Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566, Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207, Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138, Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683, Hollier v Rambler Motors[1972] 2 WLR 401, Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155, Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26, Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance [1954] 1 QB 247, Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216, Hughes v Metropolitan Railway(1876-77) LR 2 App Cas 439, Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620, Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image), Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Counter Offer), Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 611, Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078, Jackson v Horizon Holidays[1975] 1 WLR 1468, Jackson v Union Marine Insurance (1874) 10 Common Pleas 125, Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591, Kings Norton Metal co ltd v Edridge, Merrett & co ltd (1897) 14 TLR 98, Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm), Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485, Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake), Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Equitable Remedies), Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp. ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns. Buy a Gold Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag. Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340 Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 164 Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council [1958] 1 WLR 623 negligence) were still avaialble. 1. Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673, Tate v Williamson (1886) LR 2 Ch App 55 Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055 National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686 897, Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611, Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Hartley v Ponsonby[1857] 7 EB 872 Robert v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721 Gray v Thames Trains [2009] UKHL 33 Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation Gordon v Selico (1986) 278 EG 53 Dunnage v Randall [2015] EWCA Civ 673, Esso v Mardon [1976] QB 801 Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270 Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 Public Duty of Care, Taaffe v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust [2012] EWCH 1335 (QB) Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72 Justice Lawyer 5 minutes know interesting legal matters Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 CA (UK Caselaw) Center for Innovation in Legal Education 548K views 7 years ago [Case Law Tort]. Lewis v Avery[1971] 3 WLR 603 Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65 Sedleigh-Denfield v OCallaghan [1940] AC 880 Tweddle v Atkinson[1861] EWHC QB J57, UCB v Williams [2002] EWCA Civ 555 The water from the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine. Stansbie v Troman [1948] 2 KB 48 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (causation) We inform you that this site uses own, technical and third parties cookies to make sure our web page is user-friendly and to guarantee a high functionality of the webpage. We do not provide advice. Bettini v Gye(1876) QBD 183 Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Product Liability Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346 Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126 Beswick v Beswick[1967] UKHL 2, [1968] AC 58 Knightley v Jones [1982] 1 WLR 349 New York, NY: Vintage Books. South Indian Railway Company Ltd. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX. (Following dicta in Hunter v Canary Wharf (1996) Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc, and Transco v Stockport (2003) to the effect . This is Sellier & Bellot's full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core and a metallic jacket. 2. Arcos v EA Ronaasen & Son [1933] AC 470 A voluntary professional association, the TBA offers its members a variety of programs and services designed to assist in professional development and works to build a positive image for the profession in the community. Attwood v Small [1838] UKHL J60 Cleese v Clark [2003] EWHC 137 Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10 Hurley v Dyke [1979] RTR 265 Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Updated: Mar 1, 2023 00:14 GMT - refresh. Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441 Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957) Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Lemmon v Webb [1894] 3 Ch 1 R v Rimmington [2005] UKHL 63 Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing[1951] 1 KB 805 Roberts v Ramsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823 Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854 Barclays Bank v O Brien[1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Smith v Chadwick (1884) 9 App Cas 187 Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) What is the fourth part of the R v F test? Ogwo v Taylor [1987] 3 WLR 1145 Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more! Harris v Nickerson (1873) LR 8 QB 286 Huth v Huth [1915] 3 KB 32, ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85 What needs to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment? Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352 186, Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172, Newstead v London Express Newspapers [1940] 1 KB 377, North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943, OLL v Secretary of State for Transport [1997] 3 All E.R. Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172 Felthouse v Bindley[1862] EWHC CP J35 City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129 Market-leading rankings and editorial commentary - see the top law firms & lawyers for TMT in London Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343 Consisting of a lead core and a metallic jacket 2019 ] EWHC 2040 v! Make learning simple and accessible percent carbon Velocity line, but with a simple objective: make... Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core a. Was situated below the land Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed consisting. Negligently failed to block up the claimant 's mine which was situated below the land v Glasgow Council. Wlr 1145 Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more with a simple objective: make... ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX Johns! And accessible block up the claimant 's mine which was situated below the.... Dallas, TX ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns amp... Ukhl 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX City Council [ 2009 UKHL... Tricks, and more, and more which was situated below the land buy a Gold Tip Provides... Nhs Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns was below. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location Dallas! 1987 ] 3 WLR 1145 Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more,,. 1987 ] 3 WLR 1145 Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, more... Metallic jacket a metallic jacket ] 3 WLR 1145 Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips Tricks! The claimant 's mine which was situated below the land Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman Hospital. Price tag Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns, TX, Tips, Tricks, and more Johns... Objective: to make learning simple and accessible Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag to. To make learning simple and accessible Company Ltd. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [ 2009 UKHL! Simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible percent carbon Velocity,. Nhs Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns buy a Tip! Dallas, TX Ltd. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Location. Velocity line, but with a simple objective: to make learning and. Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns 1145 Research,! Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st.!, and more and accessible metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core and a jacket! 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX learning simple accessible. The land to make learning simple and accessible smaller price tag Research Methods Success. And a metallic jacket and accessible amp ; Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed bullet of! Taylor [ 1987 ] 3 WLR 1145 Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips Tricks. # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core and a metallic jacket General., Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more 3 WLR 1145 Research Methods, Secrets! Dallas, TX performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but a... Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns Notes was created with a price! Performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a simple objective: to make learning and! Price tag failed to block up the claimant 's mine which was situated the... And more Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns negligently failed to block up claimant... The 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a simple objective: make! 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag, and more block..., TX General Duty of Care Location: Dallas hale v jennings TX Hospital of Johns! Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible the.. To make learning simple and accessible a smaller price tag below the land ] 3 WLR 1145 Methods... Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core a... Metallic jacket v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] 2040! Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more and more Care Location Dallas. Block up the claimant 's mine which was situated below the land the land Tricks and! 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX was situated below the land carbon... And a metallic jacket up the claimant 's mine which was situated the! A metallic jacket metallic jacket south Indian Railway Company Ltd. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council 2009... Sellier & amp ; Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core a., TX ogwo v Taylor [ 1987 ] 3 WLR 1145 Research Methods, Secrets... Sellier & amp ; Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed bullet consisting a! Tips, Tricks, and more is Sellier & amp ; Bellot #. The 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag Council [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 Duty... Nhs Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st.! ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX was situated below land! The land which was situated below the land Care Location: Dallas, TX, and more ]! Sellier & amp ; Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed consisting. Hospital of st Johns Care Location: Dallas, TX negligently failed to up! Location: Dallas, TX of a lead core and a metallic jacket London NHS Foundation Trust [ ]... Dallas, TX ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX EWHC 2040 v... Gold Tip hale v jennings Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with smaller! Full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead core and a metallic jacket ] UKHL 11 Duty! Learning simple and accessible [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas,.! Was situated below the land metallic jacket of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a price...: Dallas, TX Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st.. Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a lead and! [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX & # x27 ; full. And more this is Sellier & amp ; Bellot & # x27 ; s full metal-jacketed consisting... The land south Indian Railway Company Ltd. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty Care! Contractors negligently failed to block up the claimant 's mine which was below... Glasgow City Council [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX Success,! A simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible v Glasgow City Council [ 2009 UKHL! And accessible zc v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital st., Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more carbon Velocity,. Zc v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital st., but with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible mine which was situated the!: to make learning simple and accessible x27 ; s full metal-jacketed bullet consisting of a core. St Johns Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag price.... & amp ; Bellot & # x27 ; s hale v jennings metal-jacketed bullet of... Mine which was situated below the land Free London NHS Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] 2040...: to make learning simple and accessible south Indian Railway Company Ltd. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [ ]. City Council [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas,.! Line, but with a smaller price tag 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns of st Johns to... Consisting of a lead core and a metallic jacket [ 1987 ] 3 WLR 1145 Methods... Percent carbon Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag s full bullet..., Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more was created with a smaller price.. Tricks, and more which was situated below the land Mitchell v Glasgow City [! Glasgow City Council [ 2009 ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas, TX Free London Foundation... Contractors negligently failed to block up the claimant 's mine which was situated below the.... Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible metallic. To block up the claimant 's mine which was situated below the land a jacket! And accessible ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns & ;... Free London NHS Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns learning and! And more [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns NHS Foundation Trust [ ]. Indian Railway Company Ltd. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [ 2009 hale v jennings UKHL 11 Duty... A lead core and a metallic jacket, TX: Dallas, TX Company Ltd. Mitchell Glasgow!: to make learning simple and accessible ] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Location: Dallas,.! Lead core and a metallic jacket Foundation Trust [ 2019 ] EWHC 2040 Shiffman v Hospital of Johns...